For a 65-year-old couple, a 100% joint-and-survivor immediate annuity (SPIA) currently pays up to $608/month per $100,000, about 88% of the $693 the same premium pays a single 65-year-old man and 92% of the $658 it pays a single woman (best of 8 A-rated carriers in our rate tables as of , 5-year period certain). Cut the survivor benefit to 75% and the starting check rises to roughly $644; cut it to 50% and it rises to roughly $681. Our advice for most couples: take the 100%. The reason is arithmetic, not sentiment. When the first spouse dies, the household loses a Social Security check but keeps most of its fixed costs, so the survivor usually needs more of the annuity income, not less. Here is how the three levels price, how age differences move the numbers, and how to size the survivor percentage for your own household.
What 100%, 75% and 50% Survivor Levels Pay
The survivor percentage is the share of the monthly payment that continues after the first death. With 100% the check never changes while either spouse is alive. With 75% or 50% the insurer expects to pay less in the years after the first death, so it can pay more up front. The table shows the trade at 65 and 70. Single-life and 100% joint figures come from our rate tables; the 75% and 50% figures are estimated from published survivor-level pricing (typically 5 to 7% and 10 to 15% above the 100% payout for couples of this age) and marked with a tilde.
| Structure (both spouses same age) | Age 65 (monthly) | % of single male | Age 70 (monthly) | % of single male |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single life, man | $693 | 100% | $767 | 100% |
| Single life, woman | $658 | 95% | $724 | 94% |
| Joint, 100% to survivor | $608 | 88% | $659 | 86% |
| Joint, 75% to survivor | ~$644 | ~93% | ~$699 | ~91% |
| Joint, 50% to survivor | ~$681 | ~98% | ~$738 | ~96% |
Source: LifeAnnuities.us quote surveys run for real clients. The figures start from quotes our agent runs for real clients, not advertised rates or illustrations. For the base tables we received 54 survey runs covering 30 client scenarios, prepared July 14 to September 14, 2026, and used 52 of them for pricing (2 runs used annual payments and were left out of pricing). 17 carriers were quoted. On we checked the tables against 7 new survey runs (4 client scenarios, prepared September 18 to 29, 2026). 11 runs were received and 4 were not used (4 runs were for a 41-year-old, well below our table ages; two of them were at $5,000,000). We repriced 1 of the 8 carriers we publish (Athene, up about 1.8%) and held the other 7 at their earlier figures. A repriced carrier has its whole table moved by its own measured change on quotes for the same age and sex. New York Life: readings were mixed, so we held its figures until the next round. Two direct comparisons with mid-September quotes came in 0.7% and 1.6% higher once premium size is allowed for. A third, measured through August, came in 0.6% lower. How each figure is built. Men: 60, 65 and 80 read at surveyed ages; 55, 70 and 75 interpolated between surveyed ages. Women: all ages derived by ratio. Joint: 55, 60, 75 and 80 derived by ratio; 65 and 70 calibrated to a direct same-age joint quote. None of the figures in our tables is a direct quote from the latest survey round. They are built from earlier rounds (read at surveyed ages, interpolated or derived from carrier ratios) and checked carrier by carrier against the latest one. Joint figures at ages 65 and 70 are calibrated to a direct joint quote (same-age joint quote, both spouses 66, 100% to the survivor, 5-year period certain, prepared September 18, 2026). That corrects an estimate. It is not a market move. Basis: single life or joint (100% to survivor), 5-year period certain, income starting next month, per $100,000. Full method and known limits. Free to cite with attribution to LifeAnnuities.us.
Per $100,000 premium, best of 8 A-rated carriers in our October 2026 rate tables, single life or joint life (100% to survivor, both spouses the same age) with a 5-year period certain. 75% and 50% rows are typical pricing relative to the 100% figure in our tables; request a quote for exact numbers. See the full joint annuity rate table and the male and female single-life tables.
Two things stand out. The 100% joint payout is only 12% below a single man's at 65. Covering a second life is cheaper than most couples expect, because the odds that both spouses die early are small. And the 50% level pays almost as much as a single-life contract on the husband, which tells you what it really is: half a bet on each life (more on that below).
Why 100% Is the Right Default for Most Couples
The instinct behind choosing 50% is "one person costs less than two." True — but spending drops less than income does. When a spouse dies:
- One Social Security check disappears. The survivor keeps the larger of the two benefits, not both (SSA survivor rules; see also annuities vs. Social Security).
- Fixed costs barely move. Mortgage or rent, property tax, insurance, utilities and the car cost the same for one as for two. Food, travel and one Medicare premium go away, typically 15–25% of essential spending, not 50%.
- The tax bill often rises. From the year after the death the survivor generally files as a single taxpayer, with roughly half the bracket width and a smaller standard deduction: the widow's penalty. See how annuities are taxed.
So the survivor's need for guaranteed income is usually equal to or higher than the couple's. A survivor level below 100% moves money from the years when it is scarce to the years when it is plentiful — the wrong direction.
How to Size the Survivor Percentage: A Worked Example
Sizing the survivor percentage takes three numbers: the couple's essential monthly costs, the survivor's essential monthly costs, and each spouse's Social Security. Here is an illustrative 65-year-old couple placing $300,000 in a joint SPIA (annuity figures scaled from the table above; household figures are examples).
| Both alive | After first death | |
|---|---|---|
| Essential monthly costs | $5,500 | $4,600 |
| Social Security (higher $2,800 + lower $1,600) | $4,400 | $2,800 |
| Gap the annuity must fill | $1,100 | $1,800 |
| 100% survivor: pays $1,824 | $1,824 | $1,824 |
| 75% survivor: pays ~$1,932 | ~$1,932 | ~$1,449 |
| 50% survivor: pays ~$2,043 | ~$2,043 | ~$1,022 |
While both are alive, all three options cover the $1,100 gap with room to spare. After the first death the gap grows to $1,800. Only the 100% contract, paying $1,824, still covers it; the 75% survivor check of roughly $1,449 falls about $351 short every month and the 50% check of roughly $1,022 about $778 short. The extra $219/month the 50% option pays while both are alive is nice to have; a $778/month shortfall for a widow or widower who may live another 20 years is a real problem.
Run the same three lines for your own household. If the survivor's gap is at or above the couple's gap (the common case), buy 100%. A 75% or 50% level fits when the survivor's gap is genuinely smaller: a pension of their own, a house they plan to downsize, life insurance on the higher earner, or a joint SPIA that is a small slice of a larger portfolio. Our annuity calculator gives you the income side of the table for any premium.
Age Gaps: Real Joint Quotes for Couples of Different Ages
Our published joint tables assume both spouses are the same age. Real couples rarely are, and the gap moves the payout in a predictable direction: a 100% joint-and-survivor contract is priced on the expected time until the second death. A younger spouse extends that period, so the monthly check drops; an older spouse shortens it, so the check rises. These are actual 100% joint-and-survivor quotes from our first survey round (July 14 to August 11, 2026; 5-year period certain, IRA funds, per $100,000), drawn from the full 17-carrier surveys rather than only the 8 carriers in our published tables. They have not been repriced since. To keep the comparison like for like, the last column shows the same-age figure from that same round: our September 16, 2026 table figure with each carrier's measured change since that round taken back out, which is accurate to within a dollar. Our same-age joint tables are themselves derived from these quotes and each carrier's single-to-joint ratios, so read the comparison column as directional:
| Couple | Best quote | Carrier | Other carriers quoted | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Man 57 / Woman 57 | $552 | New York Life | Western & Southern $547, Athene $530, Penn Mutual $527 | base-round same-age 60/60 table: about $567 |
| Man 60 / Woman 59 | $557 | Integrity (Western & Southern) | New York Life $556, Athene $547, Nationwide $540 | base-round same-age 60/60 table: about $567; single man 60: about $626 |
| Man 70 / Woman 75 | $677 | Western & Southern | Penn Mutual $670, Nationwide $668, Athene $668 | base-round same-age tables: 70/70 about $639, 75/75 about $721 |
| Woman 79 / Man 80 | $826 | Nationwide / Western & Southern (tie) | Global Atlantic $808, American National $807 | base-round same-age 80/80 table: about $837; single man 80: about $1,041 |
Read across the rows. The 70-year-old man with a 75-year-old wife was quoted $677, well above the base-round figure of about $639 for a 70/70 couple and below the about $721 for 75/75, because the older spouse pulls the expected second death forward. The 60-year-old man with a 59-year-old wife was quoted $557, against about $567 for a 60/60 couple and about $69 below the about $626 he would get on his own life. The 79/80 couple's $826 compares with the same-age 80/80 figure of about $837 and is about 79% of the about $1,041 a single 80-year-old man receives. The joint discount narrows with age because neither spouse has decades of expected payments left.
How large is the age-gap effect in general? The one hard grid in a public filing is Equitable's guaranteed 100% joint-and-survivor purchase-rate table in an SEC exhibit. It shows a 65-year-old with a 60-year-old spouse receiving about 4% less than a 65/65 couple, and 70 with a 60-year-old spouse about 10% less than 70/70. That works out to roughly 4 to 5% per five years on that 1% guaranteed-interest basis (a higher interest rate narrows the percentage effect slightly; it does not widen it). Our own quotes point to a touch more at market pricing: the 70-year-old man with a 75-year-old wife above was quoted about 6% more than the base-round 70/70 figure of about $639 for a spouse five years older. One caution on the 70/70 comparison: a direct same-age joint quote we received later (same-age joint quote, both spouses 66, 100% to the survivor, 5-year period certain, prepared September 18, 2026) showed that our estimated joint figures at ages 65 and 70 ran low for 4 of the 8 carriers we publish, by up to 1.6%. The base-round figure shown here was built the same way, so the real gap may be a little smaller than it looks. Figure roughly 4 to 6% per five years of age gap at ages 60 to 75, in whichever direction the gap runs. Couples with a large age gap are the group for whom 75% is most often worth pricing, but the survivor-need test above still governs.
Joint-and-Survivor vs. Joint-and-Contingent
Two different structures share the "joint" name, and the label on the illustration matters:
- Joint-and-survivor (joint life with X% to survivor). The payment reduces to the elected percentage after either spouse dies. This is what most SPIA carriers quote and what the estimates above assume. At 100% the distinction disappears because nothing reduces.
- Joint-and-contingent (the pension and PBGC form). The primary annuitant is paid 100% for life no matter who dies first; the reduction applies only if the primary dies before the contingent annuitant. Because it protects the primary more, a 50% contingent contract pays a little less per month than a 50% either-death contract.
If you want the higher earner's income untouched whoever dies first, contingent is the better fit; if you simply want a step-down after the first death, joint-and-survivor is the more efficient version. Ask which form is on any quote below 100%.
The Alternative: Two Single-Life Contracts
A 50% joint-and-survivor contract that reduces on either death is, actuarially, half a single-life annuity on each spouse. Splitting the premium into two single-life SPIAs ($50,000 on him, $50,000 on her) pays about the same total while both are alive ($347 + $329 = $676 at 65) and leaves the survivor their own check. What two contracts add is flexibility: size each to that person's needs (more on the lower-earning spouse whose Social Security will drop the most), spread carriers for state guaranty association coverage, or add a refund feature to only one. What they cannot do is deliver 100% to the survivor. For that, a single joint contract is the structure to buy.
The 5-Year Period Certain Overlay
All figures on this page include a 5-year period certain: if both spouses die within the first 60 months, the beneficiary collects the remaining payments in that window. On a joint contract this guarantee is close to free, since both lives must end early for it to pay. A 10-year certain typically costs a fraction of a percent and a 20-year certain typically only 2–3% for a couple in their mid-60s (more by 70). It costs real money only at older ages. If leaving something to children matters, a cash-refund joint contract is the other option, at a few percent more. See all payout options compared.
IRA vs. Non-Qualified Money
IRA and 401(k) money. A joint-and-survivor SPIA funded by an IRA can name your spouse as joint annuitant at 100% without restriction, and once annuitized the payments satisfy required minimum distributions for that contract under Treasury Regulation §1.401(a)(9)-6. If the joint annuitant is not your spouse and is more than 10 years younger, the same regulation caps the survivor percentage. Every payment is ordinary income. The age-gap quotes above were IRA-funded; the payout itself does not depend on the money's tax status.
Non-qualified (after-tax) money. Part of each payment is a tax-free return of premium under an exclusion ratio computed from your joint life expectancy (IRS Publication 939, Table VI). Because the joint expectancy is longer than either single life, the tax-free share of each payment is a little smaller than on a single-life contract, but it lasts longer. State premium and income taxes vary; see your state page.
Bottom Line
In our current rate tables a 65-year-old couple gives up only about 12% of a single man's payout to guarantee that $608/month per $100,000 continues as long as either of them lives. Choosing 75% or 50% buys roughly $36 or $73 more per month now at the cost of a much smaller check for the survivor, who will have lost a Social Security check and kept the mortgage. Unless the surviving spouse is already covered by a pension, insurance or other assets, 100% is the answer. Whatever level you choose, the spread between carriers on the same joint quote is often larger than the difference between survivor levels: the M60/F59 quotes above ranged from $540 to $557 across the top four alone. Request a free couple's quote with both of your ages and we will show 100%, 75% and 50% side by side from 8 A-rated carriers, or start with the current joint annuity rates by age and our best SPIA rates. For what a joint annuity pays at every published age from 55 to 80, and what a couple needs ready before asking for a quote, see our guide to annuities for couples.
